{
  "id": 5321158,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary Grant PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Phillips",
  "decision_date": "1967-09-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 37",
  "first_page": "405",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "78 N.M. 405"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "432 P.2d 116"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 N.M. 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5321923
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1967,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/78/0188-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1440,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.671,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.953181076708473e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4214429103781726
    },
    "sha256": "544ba2d02c75de04793a5e67be3c341e7c39cb60f20d0be1e59859de27201cdd",
    "simhash": "1:254eb4e2516e583c",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:27:10.359171+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "PIENSLEY, Jr., C. J., and SPIESS, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary Grant PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nWOOD, Judge.\nThe trial court quashed the criminal information. The State appeals under \u00a721-2-1(5) (4), N.M.S.A.1953. Since the appeal must be dismissed, we do not reach the merits.\nOn August 5th, after hearing argument, the trial court announced that the information would be quashed.\nOn August 18th the State filed a notice of appeal. The notice states that an appeal is taken \u201cfrom the order quashing Information filed in this cause on August 18.\u201d\nThere is no order of August 18th which quashes the information. Such an order was filed on August 26th.\nUnder \u00a7 21-2-1(5) (5), N.M.S.A.1953, the notice of appeal \u201cshall designate the judgment, order or part thereof appealed from.\u201d The State\u2019s notice of appeal is from a non-existent order; the notice is a nullity. The notice of appeal cannot be taken as an appeal from the order of August 26th since this order was entered eight days after the notice of appeal was filed. Bouldin v. Bruce M. Bernard, Inc., 78 N.M. 188, 429 P.2d 647 (1967).\nSince no appeal has been taken from the order quashing the information, this appeal is dismissed.\nIt is so ordered.\nPIENSLEY, Jr., C. J., and SPIESS, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "WOOD, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Donald W. Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellant.",
      "Tom W. Neal, Hobbs, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "432 P.2d 116\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary Grant PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee.\nNo. 37.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nSept. 15, 1967.\nBoston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Donald W. Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellant.\nTom W. Neal, Hobbs, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0405-01",
  "first_page_order": 445,
  "last_page_order": 445
}