{
  "id": 2741191,
  "name": "EDDIE'S INFERNO, INC., a New Mexico corporation, d/b/a Eddie's Inferno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, State of New Mexico, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eddie's Inferno, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque",
  "decision_date": "1968-09-23",
  "docket_number": "No. 8624,",
  "first_page": "512",
  "last_page": "513",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 N.M. 512"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "445 P.2d 389"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "79 N.M. 260",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2743094
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/79/0260-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1135,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.673,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08398887348258528
    },
    "sha256": "951917a1b35bb3e173ad2335e0a12d32fa763299ac15e4607ec7c0bd0fa812d3",
    "simhash": "1:2393d94e248f0972",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:21:18.946358+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "EDDIE\u2019S INFERNO, INC., a New Mexico corporation, d/b/a Eddie\u2019s Inferno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, State of New Mexico, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nCARMODY, Justice.\nThe issue in this case is identical with that decided in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, 79 N.M. 260, 442 P.2d 572 (1968). To lay at rest appellees\u2019 paralogistic argument, we reaffirm what is implicit in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, supra, that \u00a7 46-4 \u2014 2, N.M.S.A.1953, does not require the adoption of a new ordinance each year in order to impose a valid license tax.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instruction to the trial court to dissolve its injunction and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.\nThe cross-appeal, being dependent upon the affirmance of the trial court\u2019s judgment, fails.\nIt is so ordered.\nNOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "CARMODY, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank M. Mims, Albuquerque, for appellant.",
      "Montoya & Montoya, Joseph B. Zucht, Albuquerque, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "445 P.2d 389\nEDDIE\u2019S INFERNO, INC., a New Mexico corporation, d/b/a Eddie\u2019s Inferno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, State of New Mexico, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.\nNo. 8624,\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nSept. 23, 1968.\nFrank M. Mims, Albuquerque, for appellant.\nMontoya & Montoya, Joseph B. Zucht, Albuquerque, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0512-01",
  "first_page_order": 544,
  "last_page_order": 545
}