{
  "id": 2743787,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pineda",
  "decision_date": "1968-09-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 231",
  "first_page": "525",
  "last_page": "525",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 N.M. 525"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "445 P.2d 749"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "79 N.M. 289",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2735927
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/79/0289-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 N.M. 737",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5324867
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/78/0737-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 N.M. 70",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2742846
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1968,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/79/0070-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1124,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.686,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0840047045213833
    },
    "sha256": "47ebbe4c7728332083b45f145d928b99797b9627ef095c303f90aa670dd79b71",
    "simhash": "1:4f801e03bed17968",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:21:18.946358+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "SPIESS, C. J., and OMAN, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nWOOD, Judge.\nDenied post-conviction relief under \u00a7 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1967), defendant appeals. He contends that evidence was erroneously admitted at his trial because seized without a valid search warrant. The circumstances of this asserted illegal seizure were known to defendant at his trial. Accordingly, the question of use of illegally seized evidence is not a cognizable issue under \u00a7 21-1-1(93), supra. State v. Barton, 79 N.M. 70, 439 P.2d 719 (1968) ; State v. Fines, 78 N.M. 737, 437 P.2d 1006 (1968).\nAlthough defendant may not obtain a review of the seizure issue in a post-conviction proceeding, a companion case, which was a direct appeal, decided the issue on its merits. State v. Sedillo, 79 N.M. 289, 442 P.2d 601 (1968).\nThe order denying relief is affirmed.\nIt is so ordered.\nSPIESS, C. J., and OMAN, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "WOOD, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. Ray Phelps, Roswell, for appellant.",
      "Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O\u2019Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "445 P.2d 749\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 231.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nSept. 27, 1968.\nE. Ray Phelps, Roswell, for appellant.\nBoston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O\u2019Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0525-01",
  "first_page_order": 557,
  "last_page_order": 557
}