{
  "id": 5364568,
  "name": "E. C. TUCKER, William M. Tucker, Fred E. Tucker and Robert H. Tucker, d/b/a Tucker Professional Services, Petitioners, v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tucker v. State Corp. Commission",
  "decision_date": "1970-06-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 9002",
  "first_page": "588",
  "last_page": "588",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "81 N.M. 588"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "470 P.2d 309"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 44,
    "char_count": 330,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.622,
    "sha256": "98e13084a6111ee376e26f67c57effdd56cc2485c556b5be7844897195a5bd13",
    "simhash": "1:6ccbd2132982682a",
    "word_count": 53
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:30:08.757301+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. C. TUCKER, William M. Tucker, Fred E. Tucker and Robert H. Tucker, d/b/a Tucker Professional Services, Petitioners, v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ordered that motion of petitioners to dismiss the appeal herein be and the same is hereby granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "470 P.2d 309\nE. C. TUCKER, William M. Tucker, Fred E. Tucker and Robert H. Tucker, d/b/a Tucker Professional Services, Petitioners, v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, Respondent.\nNo. 9002.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nJune 18, 1970."
  },
  "file_name": "0588-04",
  "first_page_order": 634,
  "last_page_order": 634
}