{
  "id": 5334658,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie S. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant; STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Martinez",
  "decision_date": "1970-09-18",
  "docket_number": "Nos. 514, 515",
  "first_page": "51",
  "last_page": "52",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "82 N.M. 51"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "475 P.2d 51"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "81 N.M. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5367583
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/81/0331-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 169,
    "char_count": 1723,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.695,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.856319230494445e-08,
      "percentile": 0.30550313937221824
    },
    "sha256": "62684e52c88fb1d7853b8fbd99967aca94e20de93b54be751717c5ee54b3e42e",
    "simhash": "1:05c004fed5904378",
    "word_count": 276
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:16:32.756560+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "OMAN and HENDLEY, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie S. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nWOOD, Judge.\nThe defendant in each of these cases was convicted of burglary. Each moved for post-conviction relief under \u00a7 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A.1963 (Supp.1969). Each motion was denied without a hearing; each defendant appeals asserting he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion.\nMike\u2019s claim for relief is that he was \u201cMentally harassed into fear of my life\u2014 at the age of nineteen year\u2019s old \u2014 (A minor) \u2014 and charged convicted and sentenced through trickery of public \u2014 and court officials \u2014 to a term of five yerr\u2019s [sic] in the Penitentary [sic] of New Mexico\u2014 against constitutional law and safegards [sic] \u2014 of the Unite [sic] States of America \u2014 .\u201d Willie\u2019s motion makes the same claim except that he asserts he was seventeen years old.\nWhat form did the harassment take? What resulted to each defendant\u2019s detriment as a result of the assorted fear? What trickery and by whom? How did the asserted trickery affect each defendant? The records show that each defendant was represented by counsel and was convicted after a jury trial. The claims made are factually insufficient. They are too vague to state a basis for post-convicti\u00b0n relief. Pena v. State, 81 N.M. 331, 466 P.2d 897 (Ct.App.1970) and cases therein cited.\nThe order denying relief in each case is affirmed.\njs so ordered.\nOMAN and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "WOOD, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eugene E. Brockman, Tucumcari, for appellants.",
      "James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "475 P.2d 51\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie S. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.\nNos. 514, 515.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nSept. 18, 1970.\nEugene E. Brockman, Tucumcari, for appellants.\nJames A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0051-01",
  "first_page_order": 107,
  "last_page_order": 108
}