{
  "id": 5334502,
  "name": "Myrtle E. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pacheco v. Pacheco",
  "decision_date": "1971-04-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 9156",
  "first_page": "486",
  "last_page": "486",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "82 N.M. 486"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "484 P.2d 328"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "80 N.M. 237",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5353903
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1969,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/80/0237-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1280,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.707,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1580460868568013
    },
    "sha256": "47d4fe08e937bd4d186402a106352d191a1b2d69b85529e3a8a11b55076b9026",
    "simhash": "1:385b167b50443326",
    "word_count": 209
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:16:32.756560+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "OMAN and STEPHENSON, JJ, concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Myrtle E. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nTACKETT, Justice.\nThis is an appeal of an order entered by the District Court of Los Alamos County, New Mexico. After hearing on an order to show cause, the defendant Pacheco was found in contempt of court for failure to pay child support. Judgment was entered against Pacheco for $16,000 for arrearage of child support. The sentence on contempt was held in abeyance for a period of thirty days to allow Pacheco to purge himself of the contempt. This he did not do but immediately appealed.\nThere being no final order entered in this case by the tidal court, this court is without jurisdiction in the matter.\nWhile the jurisdictional question was not raised by either party, an appellate court will and should, on its own motion, raise lack of jurisdiction where an order lacks finality due to an absence of the necessary determination and order of the trial court. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Miles, 80 N.M. 237, 453 P.2d 757 (1969).\nThe appeal is dismissed.\nIt is so ordered.\nOMAN and STEPHENSON, JJ, concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "TACKETT, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Branch & Dickson, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.",
      "Abner Schreiber, Los Alamos, for plaintiff-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "484 P.2d 328\nMyrtle E. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 9156.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nApril 26, 1971.\nBranch & Dickson, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.\nAbner Schreiber, Los Alamos, for plaintiff-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0486-01",
  "first_page_order": 542,
  "last_page_order": 542
}