{
  "id": 5337875,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Valenzuela",
  "decision_date": "1971-12-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 791",
  "first_page": "391",
  "last_page": "392",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "83 N.M. 391"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "492 P.2d 1008"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "80 N.M. 364",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5363538
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1969,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/80/0364-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1041,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.614,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15809377303464411
    },
    "sha256": "1bc26b45250eba16991f2570f5a230c75f9cb1fc6c37eddfed71bb64554706c0",
    "simhash": "1:3553f1c9d9373819",
    "word_count": 157
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:09:20.437308+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WOOD, C. J., and PIENDLEY, J., concur.",
      "COWAN, J., not participating."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nSUTIN, Judge.\nDefendant was convicted and sentenced for burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). Defendant claims he did not voluntarily and understanding^ waive his constitutional right to remain silent; consequently his admissions were inadmissible at trial.\nThere is evidence that on arrest, the police officer read to defendant the \u201cMiranda warnings\u201d and the defendant stated that he understood them. His constitutional right to remain silent was not violated. His admissions could properly be found to be voluntary and were admissible at trial. State v. Pace, 80 N.M. 364, 456 P.2d 197 (1969).\nAffirmed.\nIt is so ordered.\nWOOD, C. J., and PIENDLEY, J., concur.\nCOWAN, J., not participating.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "SUTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walter R. Parr, Las Cruces, New Mexico, for defendant-appellant.",
      "David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Ronald Van Amberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "492 P.2d 1008\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 791.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nDec. 22, 1971.\nWalter R. Parr, Las Cruces, New Mexico, for defendant-appellant.\nDavid L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Ronald Van Amberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0391-01",
  "first_page_order": 517,
  "last_page_order": 518
}