{
  "id": 2767685,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Ike VICKERY, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Vickery",
  "decision_date": "1973-03-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 1076",
  "first_page": "758",
  "last_page": "758",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "84 N.M. 758"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "508 P.2d 28"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "84 N.M. 451",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2766275
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/84/0451-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 N.M. 453",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2768063
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/84/0453-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1540,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.673,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.5046715916883656e-08,
      "percentile": 0.282212785378607
    },
    "sha256": "55b4bc6793528e127a57029ee6f043d25682d4b8c395d2d9c07dee1388023faf",
    "simhash": "1:3143a0da946f3438",
    "word_count": 247
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:55.751115+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WOOD, C. J., and SUTIN, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Ike VICKERY, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "CERTIFICATION TO THE SUPREME COURT\nLOPEZ, Judge.\nDefendant\u2019s appeal from his conviction of and sentence for unlawful branding raises an issue as to the jury instructions concerning the requisite intent to commit that crime.\nThe New Mexico Supreme Court has granted certiorari in State v. Lopez (Ct.App.), 84 N.M. 453, 504 P.2d 1086, decided November 17, 1972, and State v. Gunzelman (Ct.App.), 84 N.M. 451, 504 P.2d 1084, decided November 30, 1972. The Lopez and Gunzelman decisions are both concerned with instructions to the jury concerning the requisite intent for the crimes involved in those cases.\nBy the grant of certiorari, it appears to this Court that the New Mexico Supreme Court has indicated that the matter of instructions concerning the requisite intent is one of substantial public interest that should be decided by that Court.\nCertiorari was granted in the Lopez and Gunzelman cases on January 3, 1973, and those cases are presently pending before that Court.\nOn the basis of the foregoing and pursuant to \u00a7 16-7-14(C) (2), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4), this case is certified to the New Mexico Supreme Court for decision.\nWOOD, C. J., and SUTIN, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "LOPEZ, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank P. Dickson, Larry W. Burch, Branch, Dickson & Dubois, P. A., Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.",
      "David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., James H. Russell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "508 P.2d 28\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Ike VICKERY, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 1076.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nMarch 21, 1973.\nFrank P. Dickson, Larry W. Burch, Branch, Dickson & Dubois, P. A., Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.\nDavid L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., James H. Russell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0758-01",
  "first_page_order": 914,
  "last_page_order": 914
}