{
  "id": 2769389,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie K. MANLOVE, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Manlove",
  "decision_date": "1973-07-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 1121",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "438",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "85 N.M. 438"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "512 P.2d 1274"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "84 N.M. 293",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2767788
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/84/0293-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 N.M. 189",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2744578
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/79/0189-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 992,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.696,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08423715050568585
    },
    "sha256": "5f08a1406b6baadc3d46beb0f30c9c23648f8a3ef15f050f716517d56580f555",
    "simhash": "1:a371182450c788f3",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:38:26.265107+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "HENDLEY and HERNANDEZ, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie K. MANLOVE, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nSUTIN, Judge.\nThis is a Rule 93 [\u00a7 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 4)] case, an appeal from denial of defendant\u2019s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction and sentence set forth in State v. Manlove, 79 N.M. 189, 441 P.2d 229 (Ct.App.1968).\nDefendant claims (1) there was a merger of offenses and he was improperly punished for three separate offenses; (2) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury.\nThe matters urged for reversal are ones which have already been decided or should have been submitted to this court on the original appeal. State v. Sedillo, 84 N.M. 293, 502 P.2d 318 (Ct.App.1972).\nAffirmed.\nIt is so ordered.\nHENDLEY and HERNANDEZ, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "SUTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James F. Warden, Carlsbad, for defendant-appellant.",
      "David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Dee C. Blythe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "512 P.2d 1274\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie K. MANLOVE, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 1121.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nJuly 18, 1973.\nJames F. Warden, Carlsbad, for defendant-appellant.\nDavid L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Dee C. Blythe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0438-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 500
}