{
  "id": 2839877,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Peter BARELA, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Barela",
  "decision_date": "1975-09-23",
  "docket_number": "No. 1880",
  "first_page": "446",
  "last_page": "447",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "88 N.M. 446"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "541 P.2d 435"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "414 U.S. 218",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        11715586
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/414/0218-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "414 U.S. 260",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        11715645
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/414/0260-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 1619,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.818,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.389513349492215e-08,
      "percentile": 0.337344184931245
    },
    "sha256": "00602c4898aa6ac34cf1a58c920d5b3cb9b40add6e1e0299761c31b78dcc2f47",
    "simhash": "1:1540e5ea3d366902",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:34:46.516747+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WOOD, C. J., and LOPEZ, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Peter BARELA, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nSUTIN, Judge.\nDefendant was convicted of possession of heroin contrary to \u00a7 54 \u2014 11-23(A), N. M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, 1973 Supp.). He appeals. We affirm.\nThe only question on appeal that merits consideration is defendant\u2019s claim that the trial court erroneously denied defendant\u2019s motion to suppress evidence seized from his person.\nDefendant was arrested for public drunkenness. This occurred prior to repeal of the offense of drunkenness, \u00a7 40A-20-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The police officer searched defendant and found a marijuana cigarette and a glasses case which contained heroin.\nDefendant contends that the opening of the glasses case was not a permissible search. This claim is a matter of first impression in New Mexico. \u25a0\nThe Supreme Court of the United States has now held that the full search of the person of the suspect made incident to a lawful custodial arrest did not violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. Gustafson v. Florida, 414 U.S. 260, 94 S.Ct. 488, 38 L.Ed.2d 456 (1973); United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973).\nHaving authority to search the glasses case, the right to open it naturally followed.\nAffirmed.\nIt is so ordered.\nWOOD, C. J., and LOPEZ, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "SUTIN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Larry N. Smith, Moore & Smith, Santa Fe, for defendant-appellant.",
      "Toney Anaya, Atty. Gen., Jay F. Rosen-thal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "541 P.2d 435\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Peter BARELA, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 1880.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nSept. 23, 1975.\nLarry N. Smith, Moore & Smith, Santa Fe, for defendant-appellant.\nToney Anaya, Atty. Gen., Jay F. Rosen-thal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0446-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 477
}