{
  "id": 1571168,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny RANDLE, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Randle",
  "decision_date": "1977-08-30",
  "docket_number": "No. 3163",
  "first_page": "18",
  "last_page": "19",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "91 N.M. 18"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "569 P.2d 428"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1783,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.815,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.492046603645369e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39362615891128283
    },
    "sha256": "d3a778b8dcef0931fb782892105c552fc2b1d750ef7c40d56381562c21bce0fb",
    "simhash": "1:214e7cb14bc2b37b",
    "word_count": 306
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:07:42.064818+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "(s) William R. Hendlev JUDGE",
      "(s) Joe W. Wood CHIEF JUDGE",
      "(s) B. C. Hernandez JUDGE"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny RANDLE, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe defendant was ordered to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. The defendant filed a response. The response does not show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. The response is at variance with the District Court Clerk\u2019s record.\nThe Clerk\u2019s record shows the defendant signed a Waiver of Preliminary Hearing and Presentation of Grand Jury which was witnessed by his attorney and the District Judge. The record further shows that defendant was arraigned on an information before the trial court after a Plea Agreement that no habitual charges would be filed and all other forgery or fraud charges under investigation up to May 3, 1977 would not be prosecuted. Judgment, sentence and commitment were filed on June 1,1977. On July 11,1977, defendant filed a pro se, notice of appeal.\nDefendant\u2019s response to the court\u2019s Order to show cause states:\n\u201cI was never indicted or arraigned I never had a preliminary hearing on the charge of fraud I have a waiver that was sent to me that [says] that I [waived] these. But it [does] not have my signature on it [I\u2019m] sending a [copy] of this waiver to support these facts of my plea bargain on May 3, 1977.\n\u201cConclusion\n\u201cIf the court records supports appellant\u2019s allegations of plea bargain of guilty on fraud should be dismissed.\u201d\nThe Clerk of the Court of Appeals is directed to send a copy of the response to the District Attorney and the Attorney General for possible criminal prosecution.\nIT IS SO ORDERED.\n(s) William R. Hendlev JUDGE\n(s) Joe W. Wood CHIEF JUDGE\n(s) B. C. Hernandez JUDGE",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Johnny Randle, pro se.",
      "Tony Anaya, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "569 P.2d 428\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny RANDLE, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 3163.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nAug. 30, 1977.\nJohnny Randle, pro se.\nTony Anaya, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0018-01",
  "first_page_order": 54,
  "last_page_order": 55
}