{
  "id": 1573050,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Mark SHOWALTER, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Showalter",
  "decision_date": "1980-07-31",
  "docket_number": "No. 4640",
  "first_page": "663",
  "last_page": "664",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "94 N.M. 663"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "615 P.2d 278"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "10 A.L.R.3d 974",
      "category": "reporters:specialty",
      "reporter": "A.L.R. 3d",
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "384 U.S. 436",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        12046400
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 1966,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/384/0436-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "99 S.Ct. 2560",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "S. Ct.",
      "case_ids": [
        1532114
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1979,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/442/0707-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1539,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.809,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3647297583758744
    },
    "sha256": "620c8ad16e564683b9bf687e1a72a74651331ce3dfb456fcbdddba0d74a06746",
    "simhash": "1:d2061513afc781e0",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:18:16.712923+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "HERNANDEZ and LOPEZ, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Mark SHOWALTER, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nHENDLEY, Judge.\nThis appeal by the State from the trial court\u2019s suppression of defendant\u2019s statements was placed on a limited calendar. When the brief in chief was due, the State filed a motion for summary disposition.\nIn its memorandum, the State recited that \u201c[t]he Defendant requested counsel but this request was ignored by [the] police who proceeded with continuous interrogation for an hour or an hour and a half.\u201d This was improper. In Fare v. Michael C.,-U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2560, 61 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979), the United States Supreme Court, quoting from Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), reaffirmed the procedure to be followed when an individual asks for an attorney:\nIf [a suspect in custody] indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he wishes to remain silent, the interrogation must cease.\n* \u2021 s|s %\nIf the individual states he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.\nBecause the police ignored defendant\u2019s request for an attorney and continued the interrogation, the trial court properly suppressed the statements.\nThe suppression is affirmed.\nIT IS SO ORDERED.\nHERNANDEZ and LOPEZ, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HENDLEY, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jeff Bingaman, Atty. Gen., Art Encinias, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Scott McCarty, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "615 P.2d 278\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Mark SHOWALTER, Defendant-Appellee.\nNo. 4640.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nJuly 31, 1980.\nJeff Bingaman, Atty. Gen., Art Encinias, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellant.\nScott McCarty, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0663-01",
  "first_page_order": 699,
  "last_page_order": 700
}