{
  "id": 1584563,
  "name": "COACHLIGHT LAS CRUCES, LTD., Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MOUNTAIN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Coachlight Las Cruces, Ltd. v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.",
  "decision_date": "1983-06-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 14901",
  "first_page": "787",
  "last_page": "787",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "99 N.M. 787"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "664 P.2d 985"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "85 N.M. 636",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2776996
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1973,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/85/0636-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1350,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.787,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32698219085359803
    },
    "sha256": "7807ad888b7085b9f7e17948ca19428f83a1efe4266044feaebe9faccc8d51fc",
    "simhash": "1:6d6d32d1d90545be",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:36:40.875408+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "COACHLIGHT LAS CRUCES, LTD., Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MOUNTAIN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nPER CURIAM:\nWe granted certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case. Respondent moved to quash the writ because this Court lacks jurisdiction; the petition for certiorari having been filed twenty-two days after the Court of Appeals denied a motion for rehearing.\nNMSA 1978, Civ.App.R. 28(b) (Cum.Supp. 1982) (emphasis added), states in pertinent part:\n(b) Time. Petition for writ of certiorari shall be filed ... within twenty days after final action by the court of appeals ....\nWe have held that a petition for writ of certiorari must be filed within twenty days of the date of final action by the Court of Appeals. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Rota-Cone Field Operating Co., 85 N.M. 636, 515 P.2d 640 (1973). Therefore, after reviewing the record, we hold that this petition for certiorari is quashed for lack of jurisdiction and we do not reach the merits of the petition.\nThe Clerk of the Court is directed to publish this opinion along with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Pickett, Bates & Holmes, Lloyd O. Bates, Jr., Las Cruces, for plaintiff-petitioner.",
      "Sutin, Thayer & Browne, H. Perry Ryon, Albuquerque, for defendant-respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "664 P.2d 985\nCOACHLIGHT LAS CRUCES, LTD., Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MOUNTAIN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.\nNo. 14901.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nJune 2, 1983.\nPickett, Bates & Holmes, Lloyd O. Bates, Jr., Las Cruces, for plaintiff-petitioner.\nSutin, Thayer & Browne, H. Perry Ryon, Albuquerque, for defendant-respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0787-01",
  "first_page_order": 819,
  "last_page_order": 819
}